Interesting 3D images and videos (Not necesarilly Irrlicht)

[ent1ty]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHNWj8HmWwQ

But how?

[ChaiRuiPeng]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHNWj8HmWwQ

But how?

magick of the computer gods

[ent1ty]

Unfortunately, i do not believe in higher power, not even when it's incorrectly spelled.

[Mel]

Interesting video. Very impressive. I guess that is the advantage of a deferred renderer.

[Luben]

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic

[Radikalizm]

A screenshot from a test-scene I did for checking performance on semi-huge maps in my engine
Using a deferred renderer (ditched general support for my forward renderer), hardware 2D rendering, SSGI and SSAO (which still need tweaking) and a lame screenspace water shader which still needs a lot of work (it's actually just volumetric fog right now)

Runs smoothly at 80-100 FPS with 34 active dynamic lights at a resolution of 1024x768




EDIT:

Same scene tonemapped and with a bloom shader added


This uses 64-bit HDR

[ChaiRuiPeng]

A screenshot from a test-scene I did for checking performance on semi-huge maps in my engine
Using a deferred renderer (ditched general support for my forward renderer), hardware 2D rendering, SSGI and SSAO (which still need tweaking) and a lame screenspace water shader which still needs a lot of work (it's actually just volumetric fog right now)

Runs smoothly at 80-100 FPS with 34 active dynamic lights at a resolution of 1024x768

impressive

[pippy3]

A screenshot from a test-scene I did for checking performance on semi-huge maps in my engine
Using a deferred renderer (ditched general support for my forward renderer), hardware 2D rendering, SSGI and SSAO (which still need tweaking) and a lame screenspace water shader which still needs a lot of work (it's actually just volumetric fog right now)

Runs smoothly at 80-100 FPS with 34 active dynamic lights at a resolution of 1024x768




EDIT:

Same scene tonemapped and with a bloom shader added


This uses 64-bit HDR

That looks very sexy

[Radikalizm]

A screenshot from a test-scene I did for checking performance on semi-huge maps in my engine
Using a deferred renderer (ditched general support for my forward renderer), hardware 2D rendering, SSGI and SSAO (which still need tweaking) and a lame screenspace water shader which still needs a lot of work (it's actually just volumetric fog right now)

Runs smoothly at 80-100 FPS with 34 active dynamic lights at a resolution of 1024x768




EDIT:

Same scene tonemapped and with a bloom shader added


This uses 64-bit HDR

That looks very sexy

Thanks
This engine has almost been in development for a year now, so I'm pretty proud of the result I'm able to get already

[jibblesmgee]

I think you have to use the Chinese MilkyWay super computer to run that CryEngine for cinema... that's why it's "coming soon"

[freetimecoder]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgS67BwPfFY&hd=1

soon can't be far away

[Radikalizm]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgS67BwPfFY&hd=1

soon can't be far away

You'd need a monster of a machine to run that at interactive rates at a decent resolution...

[Radikalizm]

For those interested, here's a flythrough of my test-scene
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXaTtxjOMx4

[serengeor]

For those interested, here's a flythrough of my test-scene
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXaTtxjOMx4

Looks nice
What are those objects at 0:47? skybox?

[REDDemon]

I don't think we will have videogames with CryEngine 3 for a long time and when they will come they will need incredible powerfully machines for running.