CuteAlien wrote:It looks really great! I wish it had a somewhat more relaxed license (lgpl restricting static linking with proprietary apps conflicts with using it in closed source console development where shared linking isn't possible) - you couldn't maybe consider using something like Mozilla license instead (it still protects sources, but per source-file instead of per library)?
Anyway - thanks for the system, I'm sure a lot of people here will love it
dialNforNinja wrote:Oh... oh my... this is ABSOLUTELY EXCELLENT! If you're really giving away the unrestricted license for the asking, you might as well loosen it up overall anyway, though dynamic linking is fine for my own project. Do you have a logo for the package beyond just the text? Something like this, I'd be happy to add to the on-launch splash screens with Irrlicht, SFML, & Tokamak.
hendu wrote:I assume it's on the cpu? Do you have any performance numbers?
arishapiro wrote:We want to maintain some control over the code distribution, which is why we are requesting that people formally ask us for a commercial license (which would require some information about your project and what you intend to use it for), which lets us keep track of where the code is going.
arishapiro wrote:We have been thinking about changing the license to a less restrictive one. Right now, you can get license for commercial use without restrictions by requesting it (email me to make arrangements).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest