Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [Winner Announced]

Competitions for Irrlicht or 3D in general.
Irrlicht Screenshot of the Month: Winner for January, vote for February, submit for March

Who is this month's winner?

Poll ended at Thu Aug 04, 2016 4:18 pm

devsh - 40M+ triangles, 105 degree FOV
5
45%
Vectrotek - Doom Walk
6
55%
 
Total votes: 11

Cube_
Posts: 1010
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:03 pm
Location: 0x45 61 72 74 68 2c 20 69 6e 20 74 68 65 20 73 6f 6c 20 73 79 73 74 65 6d

Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [Winner Announced]

Post by Cube_ »

And the winner is... [insert drum-roll here] Vectrotek with his "Doom Walk" entry, congratulations!
Vectrotek wrote:Doom Walk
Image
Last edited by Cube_ on Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:18 am, edited 3 times in total.
"this is not the bottleneck you are looking for"
devsh
Competition winner
Posts: 2057
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by devsh »

40M+ triangles, 105 degree FOV, 512 meter view distance and 6.8GB of Video RAM

Image
Last edited by devsh on Tue Jun 07, 2016 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cube_
Posts: 1010
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:03 pm
Location: 0x45 61 72 74 68 2c 20 69 6e 20 74 68 65 20 73 6f 6c 20 73 79 73 74 65 6d

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by Cube_ »

oh wow, that's pretty damn impressive - pretty sure we can already call the winner right here and now :P
"this is not the bottleneck you are looking for"
hendu
Posts: 2600
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 12:53 pm

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by hendu »

Those crosswalks in the distance look pretty bad. Are they not textured?
hendu
Posts: 2600
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 12:53 pm

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by hendu »

Sure, that's why textures were invented ;)
Vectrotek
Competition winner
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sat May 02, 2015 5:05 pm

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by Vectrotek »

Jeez! Very cool!
Is anti aliasing even used at all?
christianclavet
Posts: 1638
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:24 am
Location: Montreal, CANADA
Contact:

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by christianclavet »

Rules
- Only irrlicht renders allowed,
Since BAW based on Irrlicht (But extensively modified in the rendering parts). Is it still considered fully Irrlicht renders? Current Irrlicht don't have theses abilities...
Vectrotek
Competition winner
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sat May 02, 2015 5:05 pm

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by Vectrotek »

I downloaded BAW, but my machine and net connection just couldn't handle it!
The "Triangle-Based Geometry Reconstruction Anti Aliasing" is very, very advanced stuff.
It retains the geometric shape of the "Pedestrian Crossings" really well!
(almost like a human mind would try to keep the shapes intact at a very low resolution)
I think the coloring of the stripes (1,1,1) would look better if it was ( 0.8, 0.8, 0.8 ) or something with a sight natural tint
as to not create such a noticeable contrast.
It is clear to me that Build A World (BAW) sports technology not readily available to the man in the street.
Devsh, this is truly amazing stuff that the less than average coder like myself wouldn't recognize at first glance!
BAW is going places. Good Job!

It must have taken some SERIOUS geometric math for the renderer to know that the pixels
should be arranged in "that" manner to keep the lines visible at even such a distance.

I did not realize the amount of technology behind this image so I humbly pledge my guaranteed vote!

I suggest potential voters have a look at this before they vote..
http://www.cad.zju.edu.cn/home/jqfeng/p ... uction.pdf

Now I see...
Vectrotek
Competition winner
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sat May 02, 2015 5:05 pm

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by Vectrotek »

Doom Walk
Image
christianclavet
Posts: 1638
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:24 am
Location: Montreal, CANADA
Contact:

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by christianclavet »

Wow! Is this rendered with vanilla Irrlicht and shaders?! I really like the specular highlights in the scene.
Cube_
Posts: 1010
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:03 pm
Location: 0x45 61 72 74 68 2c 20 69 6e 20 74 68 65 20 73 6f 6c 20 73 79 73 74 65 6d

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by Cube_ »

christianclavet wrote:
Rules
- Only irrlicht renders allowed,
Since BAW based on Irrlicht (But extensively modified in the rendering parts). Is it still considered fully Irrlicht renders? Current Irrlicht don't have theses abilities...
I honestly don't know, they made their fork available iirc so on one hand it's still irrlicht in a way.
On the other it's heavily modified and thus an unfair advantage.

BUT since the rules don't specify any time limit for the project, you could have worked on it for a decade or even longer, I'd say that it doesn't count as a negative - given sufficient time anyone can implement it (assuming consistent growth, which would be the case with consistent programming).

And since I host the compo I'll at least give my opinion - I don't think it's my place to make the decision however - I think it's allowed.

well, that's at least my general opinion - yours may vary and if you really want you can set up a poll to have users vote over modified/unmodified irrlicht builds being allowed [rendering, adding other modifications should not be even theoretically bannable imo]
"this is not the bottleneck you are looking for"
Vectrotek
Competition winner
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sat May 02, 2015 5:05 pm

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by Vectrotek »

@ christianclavet The render is like you said, Vanilla Irrlicht and Shaders..
For the whole Project and Executable go here:
http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/forum/v ... 26#p298426
devsh
Competition winner
Posts: 2057
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by devsh »

aaammmsterdddam wrote:
christianclavet wrote:
Rules
- Only irrlicht renders allowed,
Since BAW based on Irrlicht (But extensively modified in the rendering parts). Is it still considered fully Irrlicht renders? Current Irrlicht don't have theses abilities...
I honestly don't know, they made their fork available iirc so on one hand it's still irrlicht in a way.
On the other it's heavily modified and thus an unfair advantage.

BUT since the rules don't specify any time limit for the project, you could have worked on it for a decade or even longer, I'd say that it doesn't count as a negative - given sufficient time anyone can implement it (assuming consistent growth, which would be the case with consistent programming).

And since I host the compo I'll at least give my opinion - I don't think it's my place to make the decision however - I think it's allowed.

well, that's at least my general opinion - yours may vary and if you really want you can set up a poll to have users vote over modified/unmodified irrlicht builds being allowed [rendering, adding other modifications should not be even theoretically bannable imo]
Being banned from this competition would be the uttmost honor :)
CuteAlien
Admin
Posts: 9628
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 2:25 pm
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Contact:

Re: Screenshot of the Month, June 2016 [submissions open]

Post by CuteAlien »

I also worked for years with modified Irrlicht's and so do many others on the forum. I think it's one of the biggest features of Irrlicht that the source is availabled and easy to read & change.
IRC: #irrlicht on irc.libera.chat
Code snippet repository: https://github.com/mzeilfelder/irr-playground-micha
Free racer made with Irrlicht: http://www.irrgheist.com/hcraftsource.htm
Post Reply